Pushing Down GROUP BY Views Below JOIN Views¶
When you execute a GROUP BY over a join view, Denodo may be able to push down the GROUP BY under the join view if these conditions are met:
The data of each branch of the join is obtained from different sources.
There is an association established between the two joined views. This association has to be a referential constraint and the condition mapping of the association is an “equals condition” between the fields of the primary key of one view and the fields of the foreign key of the other view.
If these conditions are met, a query like this one:
SELECT p.id, p.name, s.date, SUM(amount)
product AS p
sale AS s
ON (p.id = s.product_id)
GROUP BY p.id, p.name, s.date
Will be transformed into this one:
SELECT p.id, p.name, sg.date
SELECT s.product_id, s.date, SUM(amount) amount
FROM sale AS s
GROUP BY s.product_id, s.date) sg
product AS p
ON (p.id = sg.product_id)
You can see that the GROUP BY is pushed down below the JOIN. This will allow to push down the GROUP BY operation to the database. This transformation will usually result in a huge reduction in the number of rows that Denodo has to retrieve from the sales view.
To be able to apply this transformation, first you have to create an
association between the views
product with this
Map the fields
Mark the association as a “Referential constraint” to indicate that there is primary key-foreign key relationship between these views.
Mark the end point
productas “Principal” (making the
salesendpoint as “Dependent”)
Set the multiplicity of the
saleend point to *, which means that for each product, there are zero, one, or more rows on the
saleview with the
product_idof that product.
This transformation is specially tailored to business intelligence scenarios where there are usually very big facts tables joined with relatively small dimensions tables.
Virtual DataPort does not enforce referential integrity of the data. That is, that Virtual DataPort does not enforce that each row of the dependent view has a match in the principal view of the association. It is the responsibility of the source to keep this integrity and of the user to define the associations correctly.
If the associations are defined incorrectly, the optimizer could apply the optimization described in this section when it should not be applied.